Wired has placed an explanation about how it was misled in publishing a fake story produced by artificial intelligence.
The story explains: “After a standard back and forth about framing and payment percentages, our editor has assigned the story. The processing process also did not bring alarms; the writer accepted suggestions and responded quickly and kindly to notes. We published the story on 7 May.
“In de komende dagen werd het duidelijk dat de schrijver niet in staat was om voldoende informatie te verstrekken om in ons betalingssysteem te worden ingevoerd. Ze drongen in plaats daarvan aan op betaling door PayPal of cheque. Nu verdacht. Een bedrade redacteur leidde het verhaal door twee externe AI-detectie-instrumenten, beide zei dat de kopie waarschijnlijk was van de wintere van de winsel van de wintere van de winsel van de winsel van de wintere, de details van de Winsel van de Winsel van de Winsele, the details of the writer, the details of the winter of the winter, the details of the winter, the details of the winter, the details of the winter, the details of the winter, the winter, the details of the winter. -Manufacture.
“We have made mistakes here: this story did not go through a good fact-check process or received a top processing from a more senior editor. First contributors to Wired should generally both have, and editors must always have complete confidence that writers are who they say they are.
“Fabulists and plagiarists are as old as the media themselves. But AI is a new challenge. It makes everyone make a perfect pitch with a simple prompt and the role of journalists convincingly enough to fool, well, us. We have acted quickly when we have discovered the Russian, and we did steps to make sure that for it.
Read more here.
#waxed #duped #Freelancer #Talking #Biz #News