Peter Schiff criticized for pricing Silver Dip while basing Bitcoin

Commentators challenged the logic of treating identical market mechanisms as bullish for one asset and fatal for the other.

Bitcoin critic Peter Schiff has faced intense criticism for years for applying contradictory logic to the recent price declines of silver and Bitcoin.

After silver fell 14% on December 29, Schiff called it a buying opportunity, but labeled Bitcoin’s 30% pullback from its peak as proof it’s a scam.

A story of two corrections

The debate stemmed from a message Schiff posted yesterday, noting silver’s sharp drop from $84 to $72. calling the resulting decline in metal inventories provided a better buying opportunity.

At the same time he criticized Business intelligence firm Strategy’s Bitcoin accumulation plan, which claimed the average purchase price of $75,000 had only delivered a 16% gain over five years, a return he called poor.

The response was quick. Commentator Shanaka Anslem Perera directly challenged Schiff, noting that both assets underwent corrections driven by the same market forces: margin increases, forced liquidations and the wipeout of indebted speculators.

“I want you to explain the intellectual framework in which identical market mechanisms prove that silver is undervalued, but prove that Bitcoin is worthless,” Perera wrote.

He provided a long list of Schiff’s past Bitcoin predictions, which he said were incorrect, and suggested that the gold bug’s anti-BTC stance is a marketing strategy for his precious metals company, noting that his company accepts BTC and that he benefits from involvement in the topic.

Other experts also questioned Schiff’s financial analysis regarding Strategy, with on-chain analyst Willy Woo calling it “scam math” for not considering the time basis of the investments. The market watcher too argued that most of the $75,000 cost basis came from purchases in the last two years, not five.

You might also like:

The broader precious metals vs. crypto war

This clash is the latest in a years-long rivalry. Schiff has consistently positioned gold and silver as superior, tangible stores of value, especially during economic uncertainty. For example, earlier this month he warned that Bitcoin could lose value during a crisis ahead of the US dollar.

Furthermore, on December 22, when gold broke above $4,400, he conducted a poll asking whether the metal would reach $5,000 or whether Bitcoin would crash to $50,000 first, a vote in which less than 20% of participants opted for the Bitcoin crash scenario.

Meanwhile, a recent analysis shows that while silver and gold have had spectacular years with gains of 172% and 75% respectively in 2025, Bitcoin will end the year with a modest loss. This decline has brought the correlation between Bitcoin and the metals to a multi-year low.

However, many in crypto remain optimistic, with some analysts suggesting that if historical cycles repeat, the flagship cryptocurrency could post big gains following the metals’ rally.

That said, the community remains divided on the fundamental values ​​debate. Some, like commentator Daniel Tschinkel, have done so shown support for the continued stability of precious metals, while others, such as Fred Krueger, to believe in Bitcoin’s long-term superiority.

For now, Schiff’s latest comments have prompted less of a discussion about market mechanisms than a discussion of consistent principles, putting his own biases under the microscope.