Liverpool have contacted PGMOL to express major concerns over Virgil van Dijk’s disallowed goal during the 3-0 defeat to Manchester City on Sunday.
With City leading 1-0, Van Dijk’s header appeared to level the score, but the goal was disallowed for offside. Referee Chris Kavanagh made the decision after the assistant’s flag was raised, with VAR official Michael Oliver confirming that Andy Robertson had interfered with play from an offside position.
The incident took place when Robertson dived in front of City goalkeeper Gianluigi Donnarumma as Van Dijk met Dominik Szoboszlai’s cross. Officials deemed Robertson’s move an “obvious action” that affected Donnarumma’s ability to save, in accordance with Law 11 of the offside rule.
After the defeat, some of the best online gambling sites make sure Liverpool win the Premier League on September 1. It is understood that several bookmakers believe this loss has massively damaged the club’s bid to retain their title, with some pundits now claiming that Liverpool are already out of the running.
Liverpool seeks clarity from PGMOL
After reviewing multiple camera angles of the incident, Liverpool believe Donarumma’s view was not obstructed by Robertson. The club has contacted PGMOL chief executive Howard Webb to express concerns about the way the law was applied and request further explanation. the VAR process.
During his post-match interview, head coach Arne Slot suggested that refereeing standards have become inconsistent. Robertson echoed the same sentiment, saying he was “perplexed” by the ruling. Wayne Rooney also backed Liverpool’s view by claiming the goal should have been awarded.
Experts and fans ask for VAR
The Premier League Match Center later explained to X that the on-pitch referee’s decision had been “checked and confirmed” by VAR. However, that post was quickly noticed by the community for misrepresenting the law. Fans on X pointed out that just an “obvious action” does not automatically constitute an offside violation.
Even neutral analysts questioned the outcome, suggesting officials may have overinterpreted Robertson’s move. The controversy has once again highlighted confusion over how VAR officials determine interference in complex situations.
Continued frustration with VAR decisions
This is certainly not the first time that Liverpool has expressed its dissatisfaction with PGMOL. Most famously, the club previously sought clarification after Luis Díaz’s disallowed goal against Tottenham in 2023.
As a result of that incident, PGMOL admitted their mistake and released the VAR audio recording to show what went wrong. Whether something similar happens this time remains to be seen.
As several other clubs have also expressed frustration with the VAR calls this season, pressure is growing on PGMOL to provide more transparency.
For Liverpool, the decision may not have changed the final outcome of the match. Yet it has once again raised questions about fairness, communication and the consistency of performance in the Premier League.
#Liverpool #contacts #PGMOL #disallowed #goal #Manchester #City