By Dr. Marc Brodsky, guest writer
Suppose a doctor, which we Dr. Will mention Sample, had a nice lunch with friends in their yacht club in Greenwich, Connecticut, when the conversation focused on the subject of malpractice and protection against liability. One of the lunch with the doctor offered that he was busy setting up a domestic Asset Protection Trust (DAPT) to help protect his assets. Dr. Sample was intrigued and wanted to learn more. After lunch he called his personal financial planner and asked, “Hey, can a DAPT protect my assets if I am sued?”
Insight into personal and financial circumstances
Dr. Sample is a 55-year-old cardiothoracic surgeon with an annual salary of $ 600,000. His husband doesn’t work. They have grown children who do not live at home.

- Economic information: Dr. Sample expects inflation to be on average 3% per year and that his salary will keep pace with inflation.
- Insurance information: Dr. Sample has enriched professional malpractice and personal homeowner and car insurance by a personal liability umbrella plan (PLUP).
- Investment information: Every year Dr. Sample the maximum to a qualified pension plan in its non -profit hospital. He also invests extra savings on a taxable brokerage account. Dr. Sample tests a questionnaire itself that has determined a moderate level of risk tolerance in investments. His expected and required return is 8%. He expects to become more conservative as he approaches retirement age.
- Pension information: Dr. Sample is planning to retire at the age of 67. At that time he projects that his pension plans and investments will replace 80% of his pre-retirement salary.
- Estate Planning: Dr. Sample and his husband have a will and no other documents in planning planning.
The financial planner of Dr. Sample produced a balance and cash flows as follows.


Identifying and selecting goals
- To protect assets against potential creditors during the lifetime of Dr. Sample.
- To protect assets against creditors after the death of Dr. Sample and to improve the lives of his husband and children through their legacy.
More information here:
10 things you want to know about medical malpractice
What is social inflation and how does this influence the rising costs of medical malpractice?
Analysis of the current way of acting and potential alternative action courses
Although he has no well -known creditors, Dr. Sample further protect his assets in the case of a future lawsuit. His current plan for creditor protection is largely dependent on his professional and personal insurance policies. His qualified pension account offers some protection from creditors, as well as life insurance and annuities. Connecticut has no robust laws in the field of protection against home and does not allow married pairs of real estate as rental properties through the whole, of which both extra creditor would offer protection.
A domestic Asset Protection Trust (DAPT) is another option to protect assets in the case of a future lawsuit. A DAPT enables a donor to transfer assets to an irrevocable trust that has been established to offer future benefits to the donor and/or other family members. Traditionally, assets in a “self -deposited” trust, in which one person is both the donor and a beneficiary, would be available to pay claims of the future creditors of that donor. However, the Steenswet stipulates that a DAPT is exempt from this traditional rule, and the donor can also be a beneficiary of the trust without exposing the trust activa to future creditors.

Earlier, donors looking for this type of creditors protection that is needed to establish trusts and transfer assets to distant jurisdictions such as the Cook Islands or Nevis. Subsequently, in 1997, Alaska approved legislation that allowed Dapts. The state legislator considered his DAPT legislation as a means to generate trust activities and the resulting tax income of the state, while she also protected its citizens against the risks inherent in investing assets in overseas trusts. Since A number of other states have introduced DAPTS (including Utah, Hawaii and Virginia) for similar reasons to generate extra state income and to lower the risk for their voters who previously had to use foreign trusts.
Although a DAPT can offer strong assets protection, these trusts do not protect any assets against well -known creditors, and a trust maker must also have enough money available outside the DAPT to pay creditors in lawsuits that had started before the DAPT foundation. If you did not do this, trust would be a fraudulent transfer, and so it would not be effective to protect the assets of creditors. Planning ahead is crucial.
Developing and presenting recommendations
Connecticut is one of the approximately 20 states with DAPT laws. By following the Connecticut laws, Dr. Sample create a DAPT and continue to have rights to take advantage of assets that are transferred to the trust. The creditors of Dr. However, Sample may not have access to assets that are owned by the trust. Trust will not protect the “fraudulent transport” of assets of a well -known creditor before the transfer of assets.
The law of each state varies for both the requirements for establishing a trust in that state and the benefits for the protection of the creditor that are available under the law of that state. According to Dr. Sample the advantages and disadvantages considering setting up a DAPT in Connecticut in contrast to another state. Usually the setting up of a DAPT in a certain state requires that the donor mentions a trustee and/or investment manager that state.
Finally, it is crucial to note that if the donor is a beneficiary of a DAPT, the trust may not be effective to remove assets from the gross estate of the donor in the event of death and therefore may not reduce an affordable taxation. Other forms of trusts can achieve the purpose of tax avoidance, but those trusts may require the donor to give more control over and “pleasure” of trust than a DAPT. For example, to exclude a trust from possible liability of the wealth tax, the donor can usually not be a beneficiary. Trusts can differ in tax consequences, a matter that Dr. Sample has to discuss with his financial planner and a qualified lawyer for Estate Planning.
More information here:
How doctors can prevent it from being charged
How to survive a medical malpractice on the right
Implement a plan
Dr. Sample can involve the services of a competent lawyer for estate planning in the design and drafting of a DAPT, a discussion that must include the advantages and disadvantages of establishing a trust under the law of Connecticut versus the law of another state. Once a jurisdiction has been chosen, Dr. Sample assign a trustee that is a state resident or a Trustbedrijfsbank with a business location in the chosen condition. Trustactiva can the Brokerage account of Dr. Sample include and perhaps even his recreational asset, the sailboat. A DAPT can also be financed with a variety of other assets – including cash, companies with limited liability (LLCs), real estate, intellectual property and business assets.
Creating a DAPT is a complex strategy that can easily generate $ 10,000 or more in legal costs to determine, plus thousands of dollars per year for administration. With a net value of more than $ 10 million and a higher risk for lawsuits in his surgical specialty, Dr. Sample determine these costs well as a reasonable price to pay for the protection offered by a DAPT.
Monitoring of progress and update

After the trust has been implemented, the Trustee will be responsible for supervising the investment of the trust activa, keeping records and administration and making benefits to Dr. Sample and/or the other beneficiaries of the trust. In addition to receiving the benefits of creditor and options for Estate planning, Dr. Sample benefits from professional management and the supervision of his trust funds.
The Bottom Line
A DAPT is a potential option for Dr. Sample to achieve his main goal of assets protection, and it can contribute to the preservation of his financial legacy. Dr. Sample must further discuss the concept with financial, tax and/or legal advisers and carefully take into account the advantages and disadvantages of setting up a DAPT in Connecticut or another jurisdiction.
Do you use a DAPT? What are the benefits for you? Are there any disadvantages?
Publication: Marc Brodsky, MD, is a registered representative at Avantax Wealth Management Inc. Securities offered via Avantax Investment Services Inc., member Finra, SIPC. Investment advisory services offered via Avantax Advisory Services Inc., 3200 Olympus Blvd., Suite 100, Dallas, TX 75019. 972-870-6000. The Avantax family of companies provides exclusive financial products and services through its financial representatives. Although Avantax Wealth Management Inc. No tax or accounting services provided or supervises, Avantax representatives can offer these services through their independent external activities. This content is only for educational and informative purposes and does not represent the views and opinions of Avantax Wealth Management Inc. Or her subsidiaries. This information is not intended as tax or legal advice. Consult legal or tax professionals for specific information about your individual situation. Investments and insurance products are not insured by the FDIC or a federal government agency, are not deposits of or guaranteed by the bank or a bank suggestion and can lose value. Jeffrey A. Cooper is not affiliated with Avantax.
#Domestic #assets #protection #Trusts #Tool #Liability #Protection #White #jacket


