Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan, who is on trial for aiding immigrants, is not testifying

Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan, who is on trial for aiding immigrants, is not testifying

4 minutes, 21 seconds Read

By TODD RICHMOND

MILWAUKEE (AP) — A Wisconsin judge is accused of helping a Mexican immigrant evade federal authorities did not take the stand Thursday after her attorneys presented less than an hour of witnesses in her defense as she faces charges of obstruction and concealment.

The case against Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan was scheduled to go before the jury later Thursday after closing arguments.

The highly unusual indictment of a sitting judge is an extraordinary consequence of President Donald Trump’s immigration policies. Dugan’s supporters say Trump wants to make an example of her to weaken judicial opposition to immigration arrests.

The case is a “shot across the bow” for state judges everywhere, designed to intimidate them, said Howard Schweber, a political scientist and affiliated faculty at the University of Wisconsin Law School.

“It is inconceivable that this prosecution would have been brought under a previous administration,” Schweber said. “This is really extraordinary, I would even say unprecedented, especially in my adult life. I have never seen anything like it. And professionally speaking, it is quite shocking.”

1 by 4

This courtroom sketch shows Judge Laura Gramling Perez during the trial of Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan, Thursday, December 18, 2025, in Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Adela Tesnow via AP, Pool)

Expand

Prosecutors have tried to show that Dugan deliberately interfered with a federal immigration task force’s efforts to arrest 31-year-old Eduardo Flores-Ruiz at the Milwaukee County Courthouse.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Kelly Brown Watzka told the jury in closing arguments that Dugan had provided Flores-Ruiz with an escape route.

“A judge does not have absolute authority to do whatever she wants when she puts on her robe,” Brown Watzka said. “The defendant is not on trial because of her views on immigration policy. She is on trial because she made a series of purposeful decisions to go outside the law to help an individual evade federal arrest.”

Dugan’s team filed a motion late Wednesday asking U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman, who is presiding over the case, to find Dugan not guilty without asking jurors to deliberate. Adelman did not immediately rule on the motion Thursday, which is common after prosecutors present their case.

Dugan argued in her motion that she may have caused obstruction to the SWAT team, but that she did not deliberately attempt to conceal Flores-Ruiz. She noted that although he left through a private door, he entered the public hallway where two officers saw him.

#Wisconsin #Judge #Hannah #Dugan #trial #aiding #immigrants #testifying

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *