Which EV trucks are considered to be the least reliable according to drivers? – Slashgear

The electric pick -up market in 2025 is evolving quickly, where buyers can now choose between offers from Ford, Chevy, GMC, Rivian and Tesla. Buyers who want to switch from combustion to electric current, or who want to trade in their existing EV truck for a new model, can therefore afford to be picky. A common care in almost all buyers of new trucks is reliability, but it is a statistics that is not always easy to determine.

The current harvest of electric trucks is built on new platforms using new technology, and there are therefore limited data on their long -term reliability. It is also easy to encounter horror stories of owners about most of these new trucks, but these individual stories are not necessarily an accurate representation of the experiences of most owners. Early reports from drivers, however, start to paint a picture of how every new electric truck will last after a year or two of real use. It is inevitable that some trucks seem to do better than others when it comes to reliability, especially a few models that stand out as less reliable than their rivals.

The Rivian R1T and Tesla Cybertruck have both received a special fragmentary reputation for reliability, with a long list of both large and minor problems marked by owners. Especially an investigation by Consumer reports Saw Rivian broadcast as the least reliable car brand on the market, while JD Power The 2025 R1T gave a non -enviable reliability assessment of 69/100.

After having put 30,000 miles on the mileage counter of their R1T, Edmunds reported various problems with their truck. The Tonneau coverage of the truck failed and was not working for a few months, while Rivian developed a solution, and the inverter in front of the front station also broke, making the truck unusable until replaced. The outlet also emphasized various smaller errors, including problems with the doors and individual components.

Threads On Rivian Owners Forums Also point out an equally diverse range of problems, some serious and others more insignificant. One owner reported that their truck saw three major failures on the road in the first seven months, with two of those who completely left them. If that wasn’t enough, the NHTSA Also learns six active recall actions for the 2025 R1T at the time of writing, although some of those recall actions only influence a very small number of vehicles.

The persistent reliability problems about the R1T can be sufficient to dent the enthusiasm of some new buyers, but they have not postponed existing Rivian owners. Despite his problems, Rivian took the first place Consumer reports’ Owner satisfaction research, who beat BMW, Tesla and Porsche. It is not difficult to see why so many owners are willing to forgive the reliability problems of their trucks, because we were just impressed by the R1T TRI 2025 when we assessed it earlier in 2025, giving it a score of 10/10 for its reach, acceleration and public utility.

In addition to the Rivian truck, another pick -up that has earned a troubled reputation for reliability is the Tesla Cybertruck. Since the launch, the cyber truck has suffered a number of controversial quality control problems of quality, from metal body panels that fall to a defective accelerator pedal. A poll on the Cybertruck Owners’ Club Forum asks drivers how reliable their truck has been since it was delivered, and at the time of writing only about 52% of the respondents reported that they had not seen any reliability problems at all. More than 30% of the survey respondents said that their truck needed at least one visit to a service center for repairs.

Owner reports posted on Edmunds are more positive, where drivers give the truck on average 4.7 out of five stars of 20 reviews. The Cybertruck from 2025 is also subject to much fewer recall actions than its Rivian rival, with the only current recall about the aforementioned problem with the loosening of metal body panels. Nevertheless, the question of the cyber truck remains considerably lower than Tesla initially expected, which is probably a reason for the worrying poor resale values ​​of the truck.