Is the price for the sale of the Meazza (73 million) and the surrounding areas (124 million) in Milan and Inter? The question has been floating since November 2024, when the mayor of Milan Beppe Sala has assigned the evaluation to the well -known income agency. Especially in the evaluation of the stadium, the agency arrived with the help of the criterion of ownership of the same function, analyzing the construction costs per seat of around twenty modern stadiums and the depreciation of the aging of the Meazza. The result (73 million) seemed too low for some, including Enrico Fedrighini, councilor of the mixed group (majority), because the stadium currently generates income for 25 million a year (more than half extra loads).
But it’s not over yet. There is another aspect that comes forward by carefully reading the evaluation of the office, always about the value set for Meazza. The agency in fact states that it has also taken into account the “non -infringement” of commercial and exhibition spaces. And the impossibility of increasing these spaces would have been “certified” by MI Stadio SRL, the company that managed the Meazza.
“Too bad that, according to the Arco Associati Studio, presented at the beginning of 2024 in the city council when the mayor was also opened for the idea of the renovation, they could have become the current one twice,” Fedrighini notes. But there is more. Because MI Stadio SRL is a company halfway through Milan and Inter. “The opinion is therefore formulated by the Society of Potential Buyers,” adds the mixed group councilor, which suggests that the two subjects would be every interest in keeping the price “low”.
The postponement of the municipality of Milan
Fedrighini asked the clarification of the revenue agency. The agency replied reference to the municipality of Milan for any request for clarification, since the estimate of the value of the Meazza was paid on the basis of a “cooperation agreement” between the two entities. The councilor then also wrote to the directorate of the state and the heritage of Palazzo Marino, but points out that “the agency refuses to answer a precise and public interest question: why did he consider the opinion of Inter and Milan as decisive for the depreciation of the Meazza value? We are talking about a public property.
Who has given the opinion to the revenue agency?
And there is another doubt: the opinion of MI Stadio according to which the commercial and exhibition spaces could not be increased (while, as we have seen, the renovation projects demonstrate the opposite), was provided to the Revenue Agency by MI Stadio itself or, based on that cooperation agreement, directly from the Milan’s Schazeasza, while agency?
#accusation #San #Siro #devalued #suggestion #Milan #Inter