https://www.rt.com/news/625899-canadakraine-freeland-taxpayer/ukraine has just generated a cash thrust for Western taxpayers

Last month the former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s Vice Prime Minister, Chrystia Freeland, from the cabinet of the new Prime Minister Mark Carney. He did her a huge favor. Because she no longer has to pretend she represents Canada while following her true passion: represent Ukraine.

Freeland has a new role: “Special representative for the reconstruction of Ukraine,” officially spoken. The first question that came to me when this heard was, was, “When can she finally move to Kiev?” Imagine my disappointment to learn that she doesn’t.

Well, actually my first question was, “Is Ukraine now under reconstruction? Am I slipping into a coma and do I miss the bomb show to complete?” No, the conflict is still furious. But I think it sounds like she is keeping a carefully aware of the money that Carney has “Promised” to Ukraine – perhaps in the same way as people “Promised” To pay me a dollar per round for my youth swimming swem-thons, bail when I returned to collect after participating in 500 laps. I think time will learn. Canadian taxpayers can only pray that will be the case, and that Carney is simply virtue that canadian cash for Ukraine and not actually steer something, in the same way as the yokers running the EU, making a big smell about the evil of Russian energy while importing on the Down-Low by third countries.

In the meantime, Canadian money for weapons, “For Ukraine”, “ It is certain to pump up the integrated American/Canada military industrial complex, which seems to be the Western strategy to stimulate their GDP nowadays in the midst of their tank economies.

Another question: Will Freeland use its experience to block the Canadian bank accounts if the Minister of Finance of Trudeau protests during the COVID era freedom Convooi Anti-Mandate to block shady money that flows to Ukraine? I am not guessing, if only because those Canadian bank accounts were blocked under the ultimate false pretext (as determined by the Canadian intelligence) that foreign cash interference was with the decisions of the Canadian government. In the case of Ukraine, they are considered foreign cash as a plus point because it comes from the West. It seems that she would rather tackle something that stands in the way.

Anyway, Freeland has just used its new role -funded role by the Canadian taxpayer To plead the case of Ukraine On the pages of the Financial Times.

She wrote that “The fact is that we need Ukraine to save ourselves,” Probably from the other side of the world, in Ottawa. She then qualifies a dark, controversial drone activities around the border of Ukraine – EU as “Recent raids in central and even Western Europe.” At least I think she refers that. Unless I somehow missed the Russian tanks that roll the Champs-Elysées. She does not specify. But it doesn’t matter. All the better, apparently to claim that these incidents “Show NATO needs Ukraine as a shield against Russia.”

Sounds like Wat Vladimir Zelensky the other day said. The Ukrainian leader went over an incident of a few alleged 90 drones over Ukraine last month, of which he said they were on their way to Poland. He said that if only 20 actually ended up there, it was only because Kiev shot the rest. The implication? That Ukraine saved Poland. Trump was asked about it at the time and Zelensky did not praise exactly as the Savior of Poland. In fact, he shrugged and said, look, whatever – could have just been accidentally.

Freeland also mentioned Trump’s tongue-in-cheek comments from the other week when he was knocking on social media about how Ukraine won on the battlefield against Russia and could probably even conquer Russian territory. He then offered to sell the Europeans all American weapons they wanted in that goal. Which part of Trump wish them “success” Freeland did not understand as a comment on the fact that Trump would like to benefit the EU’s delusions, as long as Washington does not have to get his hands dirty? Apparently she didn’t grab it. Because she wrote that in the FT “US President Donald Trump was doing well with the UN last week: Ukraine is a winner and Ukraine can win.”

Freeland had literally just written from Ukraine in the same piece, a little further up, that “We assumed that it would lose, at least without extraordinary effort from us.” Real? Your entire Posse in Canada has been saying differently for years. “Ukraine will win and Canada will be there until the end,” said The Canadian Foreign Minister Anita Anand, early 2023, when she was Minister of Defense.

So now we have gone “Ukraine will win” Unpleasant “Ukraine will only win if we do everything except Pull the Trigger” Unpleasant “We need Ukraine because NATO is so weak.” Yes, so weak that NATO is actually considering shooting drones from the sky with F-16s, as the Romanian defense minister suggested during a recent Warsaw protection forum panel.

Freeland adds that the West can learn over Ukraine “How you can fight a 21st-century war, and how you can reinvent, produce and continue to reinvent the weapons that we need for this new way of war in real time.” Watch out, people! Freeland has just discovered guerrilla warfare, apparently not the two-edged sword it represents.

It is all good if Ukrainian Nazis are trained by NATO troops to fight against Russia, and when they then graduate to fulfill Freeland’s fantasy to pretend to do NATO how guerrilla warfare is as if it is a matter of being a lack of power and not just guerrilla -warfare.

What might go wrong with Ukraine asymmetrical warfare “lecturer” To justify the West, does it turn into a gigantic weapon toys? It is not as if there has not been Reports lately From Latin -American drug cartels that receive their drone training in Ukraine to use at home. We are talking about Mexican and Colombian gangsters, according to Defense News, one of the leading military publications. Only your average start-up, really.

Freeland then continues with the fact that the idea that is recently promoted by the German Chancellor Friedrich Merz of stealing directly of € 140 billion in European Russian assets as a “loan” For Ukraine. Ukraine apparently just pays it back as soon as Russia gives the mistake and writes a check, isn’t it? In other words: never.

It is one thing for Freeland to justify its new role by blowing in the Western press and virtue signaling. It is still one to leave the taxpayers the bill if its real task should be to terminate this war as quickly as possible by diplomacy, so that a legitimate reconstruction company can be done in the interests of Ukraine, in which not only a taxpayer is financed racket.