By Maurizio Delli Santi * –
In the third year, the historical truth, the international law and consciousness of every free man cannot be canceled that 2222, 2022 in history was delivered as the start of an “aggression war” to Ukraine, the mean attack on the independence of a people, for the “collective West” and their choices of freedom and democracy, not of war. The element of novelty today is that Russia, although worn out and still far from a decisive turning point on the field, is rewarded by Trump’s Voltopaccia. In the name of America First, the US President is convinced of the US President with Putin, convinced that he had a friend in the competition with what he believes that the real enemy for US things, the China of Xi Jinping. Despite a “war war”, the new VS -VS legitimized, as such punished by a resolution of the general meeting of the UN, the slaughter of the citizen of Bucha as of many other Ukrainian cities and the immense destruction of civilian property, which is brought out of international isolation.
He has promoted his new agreement with the attacker for the division of the empire in which he does not recognize a rumor from the EU and pays a nation that fought to be free and independent, and now also blackmailing with the sale of the rare countries. The reactions of the most important European leaders have been strong and unambiguous, because there were in the world of authentic liberal and democratic culture in an Italy that remains honest: there are people who look forward to the Trumpian turning point in the name of a wrongly understood Pacifism that Ukraine for the exaggerated corpses to know how to do with Trump.
Repeat analysts how it is necessary to restore strategic autonomy for Europe, the priority of which must be a leap forward in the common European defense. You can also respond to Trump with the same policy on financial tasks and mechanisms that remind him that Europe is the largest market for American products, and that financing and products that are indispensable for the US flows. To support Ukraine’s resistance, Europeans still have the frozen Russian assets available in European banks. But there is a weapon on which a less uniform Europe can count, and it is no coincidence that it is suggested by Trump’s last care: the claim that we do not talk about “aggression to Ukraine” at the G7 and the UN. The new autocrats are aware that, in addition to his infimal verbal escalation, he does not have the executive order that he abused at home to impose his thickness on. However, he will have to confront international law and a UN resolution if he wants his ‘peace agreement’ to be legitimate. The European Union has a duty to strongly re -launch the debate on the primacy of an international order based on the rules and multilateralism in all vouchers, a subject that has also been referred by President Mattarella in Marseille in recent days.
In contrast to the nineteenth -century peace treaties, after an aggression war today, an agreement must be “valid” on the principles of the United Nations Charter. On the basis of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, a negotiation is also made of two NEO -imperative powers, which does not take into account the security requests of Europe, starting with the Baltic countries, Poles and Moldova who are already threatened with retribution, convicted of illegality and irrelevance. These are necessary conditions, and cannot be set aside, which has already been approved by the General Meeting of the United Nations, the most representative body of the international community. In the “Urgent session” of March 2022, the resolution A/ES-11/L.1 Aggression against Ukraine was adopted, which convicted the Russian intervention and imposed the termination of hostilities by illegal territorial conquest. The opposite votes were only 5 (Russia, Wit -Russia, Eritrea, Noord -Korea and Syria) on 141 favorable (35 abstentions). A binding character must be recognized in that resolution, due to ‘replacement’ with regard to the slowness of the Security Council (blocked by the veto of Russia, part of the cause): the previous one is in the uniting peace resolution that put an end to the Korean war. It was heard of the A / ES-11 / L.1 ResolutionBut few read it while it would be appropriate to call the most important passages on this anniversary:
The general meeting, […] the fundamental interest of confirming the United Nations Charter in promoting the state of affairs between the nations; […] Reminder of the obligation of all states on the basis of Article 2 of the map to refrain from their international relations of the threat or use of violence against the territorial integrity and political independence of a state, or in another way that is not consistent with the purposes of the United Nations and the solution of international disputes with peaceful means […];
1. He repeats his dedication in favor of sovereignty, independence, unity and territorial integrity of Ukraine within his limits that are internationally recognized, extends to his territorial waters;
2
3
4
Europe can still resort to the instruments of international law to combat Trump and Putin’s delirium of omnipotence, keeping itself and the dignity of free peoples.
* Maurizio Delli Santi is a member of the International Law Association and is the author of ‘The War in Ukraine and the challenges for the new international order’, Aracne.
#Europe #rich