Chiara Ferragni ready to summarize Fenice (and to reach the majority)

Chiara Ferragni goes to the majority of Fenice and is willing to reinforce the company again. As reported AnsaIs the influencer ready to give a significant boost to the light of the decision taken during the business assembly of 30 March, when a capital increase of 6.4 million euros was launched with the approval of Ferragni (which was 32.5%) and Paolo Barletta (40%) (40%). Pasquale Morgese, a shareholder for 27.5%, had the but other details stem from the minutes of that meeting.

The report of the meeting

The meeting, it was understood by the contradictory positions, was far from peaceful. The meeting – as seen from the report submitted by the notary – started the losses of the company, marked by the Fenice manager, Claudio Calabi. Losses for 6.9 million, a negative equity of 2.9 million and a further loss of 3.3 million euros in 2024. For the lawyer of Morgese, Filippo Garbagnati, “the documentation is missing” and “the budget of the participatory Fenice Retail” would not be available to the Chiara Ferragni stores. Fenice Retail, managed by the influencer, underwent “very relevant devaluations in the budget of 2023”, but in 2024 there would still be credit payments in Fenice. In addition, costs such as the “payment of employees” of a company to “liquidation” would have been inserted in the budget of 2025.

“The budget is not absolutely truthful or confirmed by adequate documentation and manifesting a considerably higher needs than the actual needs of the company”, this is the Morgese line according to which the lack of documents would be “the work of the previous administrative instance”. Ergo, Chiara Ferragni and Paolo Barletta who were head of Fenice until 2024. Calabi’s response is ready that stated that he “had always operated exclusively in the interest of the company to protect members and creditors”. For the manager – at the head of the company from the end of 2024 – “Some members have introduced highly invasive control activities, with which they can have total knowledge of the progress of social management and the patrimonial consistency of the company” and the statements of Morgese are “instrumental and pretentious since the interests in conflict with the company”.