Allahabad High Court asks the government to regulate caste glorification, to remove caste references from Firs, public data

In a highly formulated order, Allahabad High Court, earlier this week, ordered the Government of Uttar Pradesh to regulate the caste glorification and to ban the cupboards in FIRs, public registers, signs in cities and villages, etc..

The Bank of Justice Vinod Diwaker also asked the government in its order of 16 September to curb caste emblems and slogans in public, as well as private vehicles and the content of caste glorification on social media.

The court in which it is stated that the law makers must ensure that they work on promoting institutions and community centers instead of exclusive caste-based institutions, the court pointed out that to minimize caste discrimination, the government must have next to laws. It suggested that school curriculum modules should teach children about equality, dignity and the dangers of caste prejudices. It also suggested that initiatives at community level, compulsory training for civil servants, teachers and employees about caste sensitivity.

A sense of one of the speeches held by Dr. BR Ambedkar, the court noticed that caste is anti-national.

“In India, there are castes. The Castes are anti-national. In The First Place, They Bring About Separation in Social Life. They are anti-national also because they generate jealousy and antipathy Between Caste and Caste Dr. Ambedkar and added that if India has to Become a truly developed nation by 2047, it is imperative that Deeply Entrenched Caste System is eradicated from the society.

The observations were made during an application under section 482 CRPC, which stated that the cupboards of the accused persons in the FIR and other related documents were mentioned.

The court came to the police heavily and said that the impartiality and enforcement neutrality should be aware of cultivated, especially in a society where Kaste is omnipresent.

“Writing or the caste of an accused- without legal relevance comes down to identity profiling, no objective investigation. Strengths prejudices, corrupts public opinion, pollutes judicial thinking, violates fundamental rights and undermines constitutional morality,” it added.

The DGP on a part of an ivory tower policeman, disconnected from Constitutional Morality, and eventually only retired as a bureaucrate in uniform. “The court said it is not impressed by the justification offered by the higher most police officer; van de Staat about naming the caste of the person in Fir.

“According to the court, the DGP, from a third world background, seems to have little exposure to the complex reality of Indian society and the requirements of professional police work,” said it.