The opinions of contributing entrepreneurs are their own. </p><div>
Key Takeaways
- The standard 5-step AI privacy playbook is necessary and helps manage risk, but it has a major blind spot: it accepts that data will leave your environment at some point.
- Client-side filtering – detecting and redacting sensitive data in the browser before sending anything to an AI provider – is the sixth step that most founders skip.
- If personally identifiable information never leaves the user’s device, no third party can misuse, leak, or improperly store it.
Meta has been fined €1.2 billion. Amazon scored $812 million. Microsoft must pay $20 million for storing children’s data without parental consent. The headlines keep coming and the pattern is clear: regulators are no longer issuing warnings. They issue sanctions.
For founders building AI-powered products and services, the privacy playbook has become essential reading. Most now follow the same five steps. But after building an EdTech platform for a UK university, I discovered that these steps share one fundamental flaw: and fixing it changed everything.
The standard script
If you’ve spent any time researching AI and data protection, you’ve come across these five steps in one form or another. They represent the consensus view on protecting customer data when using AI tools.
Step 1: Classify your data
Before data touches an AI system, you need to know what you’re working with. Public information, internal documents and sensitive customer data require different handling. The founders who skip this step are the ones who end up in compliance nightmares later. Implementing a simple three-level classification – public, internal and confidential – takes an afternoon and prevents most accidental exposure. Before evaluating an AI tool, start here.
Step 2: Choose AI tools with good agreements
Free versions of ChatGPT and other consumer AI tools train on your input by default. Enterprise versions offer contractual guarantees that your data remains private. Look for SOC2 compliance, explicit no-training clauses, and clear data retention policies. The contract is just as important as the options. Building trust and transparency with customers starts with the suppliers you trust with their information.
Step 3: Redact and anonymize before sending
Mask personally identifiable information before it reaches an AI system. Names become placeholders. Account numbers are tokenized. Email addresses disappear. This can be automated at the API layer or handled via preprocessing scripts. The goal is simple: if data leaks, it should be meaningless to anyone who intercepts it.
Step 4: Isolate AI from production systems
Treat AI tools like a new employee on their first day: limited access, controlled interactions, and no keys to the production database. Use read-only replicas. Create sandbox environments. The AI gets what it needs to do its job and nothing more. One misconfigured API connection can expose your entire customer base.
Step 5: Build human guardrails
Technology alone cannot solve this. Written policies, approval processes for new AI tools, and regular training for your team create the human layer that makes up for what automation lacks. According to recent research, 27% of employees admit they feel comfortable sharing sensitive work information with AI tools without first checking company policies. Your policies should be clearer than their assumptions.
The blind spot
These five steps are necessary. Follow them. But they share one assumption that most founders never question: they all accept that data will leave your environment at some point. Enterprise agreements protect data after it reaches a third party. Editors scrub data before sending it. Policies determine what is sent. Each step manages what happens around the transfer of data, not whether the transfer occurs at all.
This is important because trust is still needed somewhere in the chain. You trust the security of your business AI supplier. You trust their employees. You rely on their subprocessors and the legal protections of their jurisdiction. For most use cases, this calculated confidence is acceptable. But for founders handling child data, health information, financial data, or academic data, “acceptable” may not be enough.
Microsoft’s $20 million settlement proves that even trusted vendors make mistakes — and regulators hold the data controller accountable anyway. Understanding what’s at stake before a breach occurs is the difference between preparation and damage control.
The sixth step most founders miss
When building an AI-powered learning platform for the Artificial Intelligence University, we needed privacy guarantees that went beyond contracts and policies. Student data should not be at risk of exposure – period. We evaluated all the major AI providers, but none offered what we needed. So we built it ourselves.
The solution was client-side filtering: detecting and redacting sensitive data in the browser before sending anything to an AI provider. The approach is described in our technical white paper published through AIU.
The principle is simple: if personally identifiable information never leaves the user’s device, no third party can misuse, leak, or improperly store it. Enterprise agreements become a backup layer rather than the primary protection. This is how we built BelGPT to deal with privacy — processing at the source instead of relying on the destination.
The founding fathers who solve privacy at the point of origin rather than the point of arrival are building something that competitors cannot easily replicate: true trust. As AI tools become standard infrastructure, whether you use them will no longer make a difference. The question will be whether your customers have ever had to wonder where their data went. The first five steps protect you from liability. The sixth protects something more valuable: your reputation.
Sign up for the Entrepreneur Daily newsletter and get the news and resources you need today to help you run your business better. Receive it in your inbox.