These are the stupidest cars for sale today – Jalopnik

In the same way there are many stupid people, there are many stupid cars. These are vehicles that exist in a world outside common sense or reason – vehicles that should never have reached the planning phase. Yet not all are equalized. After all, stupidity is a spectrum, and that led me to my question last week.

I wanted to know which cars you all thought were the stupidest for sale. Which car is so stupid that you see it on the road and ask yourself what the driver thought for God’s sake? As always you have delivered clever devils and we have some really interesting and creative choices. Of course there are also the usual maths of large trucks and SUVs, but that will be expected.

Anyway, that’s enough to chase me. What about you below and see which cars you co -Jalops consider as the stupidest one for sale today? I apologize in advance if your car has made the list. Don’t take it personally. It just means that you are a big old dummy.

Every pick -up with a bed so high off the ground that the owner cannot load the truck and therefore buys a trailer to drag two bags of fertilizer; Thus, the amount of space they take on roads and at parking spaces and create a danger at any intersection that they cross because they do not know how to navigate a turn of ninety degrees (or another turn, actually) pulling a trailer without cutting opposite driving strips.

Submitted by: Terry McLeod

The Dodge Hornet. I have no idea who it is, or what people possess to buy it. It looks too small to be more meaningful than a typical sedan, and it doesn’t look really good either. This is another case that an car maker takes a historic type plate of a sports car and hits it on a cheap crossover … I can’t even blame the manufacturer, the consumer here all blames.

Submitted by: Agon Targeryan

Jeep Grand wagoneer, without a doubt. It is strangely styled, has a doubtful reliability and it is stupid expensive. You should be crazy to buy one about a Tahoe, Expedition, Denali, Escalade, XC90 or one of a dozen other large people-movers.

Submitted by: Buddys

Dodge Charger EV, I love EVs, I own and EV, but have never thought of buying a Dodge Charger EV.

Submitted by: Towman

Although I don’t have beef with the car itself, I have to say the Mustang Mach-e, purely just because it has the word Mustang in his name. They could have called it everything. They should have returned the escort name. Or has a completely new name invented their whole new car that does not look or evokes something that looks like a mustang (a car that still exists). It is the equivalent of McDonalds that bring a new sandwich to the fore with vegetable pasties, a completely different sauce and no middle slice of bread and then calls it ‘the Big Mac-e’.

Submitted by: dex_meridian

Ford Expedition, GMс Yukon or something similar. Almost every 3-row SUV or full-size truck that is longer than most garages and a hood height has at or above the head of an average head of primary school, including (apparently desirable) functions such as non-existent efficiency and expensive maintenance.

Submitted by: TheHerible

Million Dollar Plus Supercars. Yes, it has the performance of an F1 car and massage with air conditioning. But they are comfort and performance is purely theoretical. Most are driven from a truck and in a hermetically sealed garage, where they will sit until they lose the favor and are sold to another rich idiot who sees this car as just a different expensive watch or accessory to be collected and occasionally shown to the right people.

It is stupid to do so much work on the design of a car that will never be used for something other than an investment option. It is stupid to distract resources to a program that produces these things when that money can be better spent on coming up with a better EV or even a cleaner, better, faster ice engine.

Submitted by: buckfiddious

I will be hated, but I say that Toyota Crown is there. Crown is a good car but a stupid one. The Avalon was actually a Japanese Buick Park Avenue for the buyer who did not care about the snob factor of the luxury brand, but wanted luxury car experiences. The crown looks very strange in terms of body design and it is generally an ugly vehicle. I have seen less than 10 in the wild since they launched. Don’t know what’s going on with Toyota. Now they have also made a horrible new Lexus ES model.

Submitted by: tex

My choice would be the Mazda CX-70. When Mazda introduced the CX-90 for the first time, everyone thought the 70 would be smaller. It appears that it is only a 90 without the third row – and yet it is usually more expensive because it has fewer equipment levels. The only things that distinguish it are the lower part of the front bumper and some exterior/interior color choices. Strange for a company that usually makes good decisions.

Submitted by: Jonnob 951

Lamborghini Urus. It is an Audi RSQ8 in a very ugly Lambo suit for more than twice the money. The only reason to buy one is to show off.

Submitted by: Bitter65

Alfa Romeo Tonale. I know it is pronounced tone, but I will be damn if I drive around in a vehicle that is clearly called the toenail.

Submitted by: Johnnywasaschoolboy