It is almost certainly a tombstone on hypotheses other than direct sale to Milan and Inter for the San Siro Stadium and the surrounding areas. The City Council of Milan (with the mayor Beppe Sala present to vote against) rejected an agenda of the day of Europe green (with 5 votes in favor) and an address resolution of Enrico Fedrighini and others (with 7 votes in favor) who, albeit in a different way, both went to commit the junta to proceed with The Renovation of the Meazza Instead of Joining the Request of the Clubs to Buy The Areas, Break Down The Meazza and Create A New Stadium.
The documents arrived in the classroom with dilated timing. The agenda of the green Europe dates from about a year ago, and in the text there are some passages that are influenced by recent times. The resolution proposed by Fedrighini is more recent: it was designed after, in November 2024, the mayor Beppe Sala illustrated the intention of the clubs to buy stadium and areas, but was postponed twice before it was discussed in the classroom. Critical oppositions on both this “dilated time”, both about the presence of two almost super punchable texts, and about the internal departments of the majority that, however, has never hidden them on the stadium theme.
“The clubs have now not yet received the instructions from the council, in addition to being late at the economic financial level, but they wrote to the municipality that they will take the right to decide,” said Francesca Care of Europe of Europe: “We believe that the municipality should not do the same:” We believe that the municipality should not do the same: “other subjects”.
The two documents
The proposal on the agenda of Europe Green, signed by Francesca Spa, Tommaso Gorini and the now former city councilor of the Sala Gabriele Rabaiotti list, proposed proceedings in two phases, with a moment of listening from below and subsequently outlined the criteria and the demonstrations of the criteria, including the inclusive of the Collecting, inclusive. The address resolution proposed by Fedrighini (and signed by Carlo Monguzzi from Europe Verde, Marco Fumagalli of the Sala list, Alessandro Giungi, Rosario Pantaleo and Angelica Vasile of the Democratic Party) contained the idea of an urgent public call to define the destination of the Meizz area. “After the mayor had illustrated the ideas of the teams in November, without ever having seen the restructuring project of Webuild that the mayor had also called ‘beautiful tender’, we also want to reduce a public tender to the center, also to strengthen the mayor for the overwhelming of the clubs. The question of the best result was not for the best result, but for the best fond of the best fondses and guarantees for the best fond, for the best fonds. The financial funds, but for financing, but for the finances, but for the ammunition of the Milan.
“The position of this classroom is Coherent”, Beatrice Uguccioni, leader of the Democratic Party, intervened and defended the line of the Junta: “We approved three orders of the day, in 2019, in 2022 and November 2024. In all these Condoms of the Day, we have been in the maths. Fedrighini had previously emphasized that the depreciation of the Meazza was indicated in that evaluation, according to him, excessive.
Debate
The councilor for city planning, Giancarlo Tancredi, expressed a negative opinion about the junta about both documents. “On November 11, the city council already spoke with an agenda just after the mayor’s report, so we cannot give a favorable opinion to a new agenda that differs from the approved. In the meantime we follow a different procedural process and we wait at the clubs to send us the updated economic financial plan,” Tancredi said.
The two debates, one after the other, almost overlap the arguments. The Democratic Party is clearly against, with the President of the Urban Planning Commission Bruno Ceccarelli, according to which a call for the renovation of the Meazza was useful, such as “Piano B”, some time ago, and in a certain sense an agenda that could have actually “actually” led to the teams, while we actually “actually” for the teams “actually” for the teams “actually” for the teams “” actually “for the teams” “actually” for the teams “” actually “for the teams” “actually” for the teams’ teams. So also Giulia Pastorella and Gianmaria Radice, in 2019, when the public speech about the Meazza started.
#city #council #sinks #renovation #San #Siro