Muhammad’s lawsuit was previously rejected with prejudice. Month by a judge of the American court in Pennsylvania. Because the case was rejected with prejudice, the only option of the plaintiff is to make his claims heard again via a profession.
The suit was initially submitted in October 2024 by Maurice Muhammad, a broker at Progressive Realty. He claims that, the Pennsylvania Association of Realtors” Greater Lehigh Valley Realtors And association -leaders have violated the federal articles of association of civil rights, involved in illegal discriminatory practices and violated their contracts. Moreover, he claims the establishment of a monopolistic system and violations of federal antitrust laws. Muhammad represented himself in the case.
In his statement that the defendants’ motion give to dismissal, judge Joseph F. Leeson wrote that Muhammad only did “bare and finished allegations” that the defendants are concerned with determining or control of price.
Moreover, Leeson did not discover that Mohammed had claimed ‘sufficient “that limiting MLS access to broker members’ imposed an unreasonable trade’.
In an e -mail statement, a spokesperson for Nar wrote that the trade group is of the opinion that the court was correct when rejecting the lawsuit.
“The integrated structure of the association is essential for the value that we offer our members, including a uniform voice on policy issues, a uniform ethical code and important tools and possibilities for professional development that help members achieve and implement their next transaction. We will continue to appeal,” the spokesman added.
#Muhammad #Antitrust #Nar #heads #court