The opinions of contributing entrepreneurs are their own. </p><div>
Key Takeaways
- Business leaders are tackling the challenge of transparency in historically opaque industries, revealing a trend toward valuing long-term trust over immediate profits.
- Companies like CarMax and PayPal are setting precedents by rejecting information asymmetry and opting for consumer-friendly practices that reshape industry standards.
- Pursuing transparency within leadership roles is critical to dismantling systems that thrive on confusion, leading to a more trust-oriented and customer-centric business approach.
The harder it is to understand an industry, the easier it is to confuse opacity with expertise. Many sectors remain opaque not because they are complex, but because opacity is profitable. Leaders in opaque markets often optimize for information asymmetry, short-term margin extraction, and low accountability rather than long-term value creation that appears valuable from the outside.
In these environments, trust often passes for competence and authority comes from shaping the narrative rather than actually delivering results. Gold is an obvious example, but it is far from the only one.
Sign up for How Success Happens to learn from well-known business leaders and celebrities, and discover the shifts, strategies and lessons that fueled their rise. Receive it in your inbox.
The gold industry as a stress test for leadership
Historically, the sale of gold and jewelry has been hostile. Many transactions occur during moments of emotional vulnerability, when people are forced to make financial decisions quickly and with limited information. That imbalance sets the tone for an interaction that requires trust but is rarely earned.
The industry has long been confused by design. Transparency is to the benefit of buyers. Offers are difficult to compare, price formulas are unclear and high-pressure sales techniques predominate. Moreover, the gold market is controlled by only a few major companies, making it too complex for outsiders to assess actual market conditions or hold anyone accountable.
These factors make customers vulnerable. Customers are expected to trust buyers without clear pricing frameworks, consistent industry standards or knowledge of what actually happens after they sell their gold. When a system depends on confusion to function, solving it requires leaders to be willing to absorb the discomfort internally before customers ever feel relief.
The Counterintuitive Leadership Movement: Start Reversing Incentives
When I started AlloyI didn’t start with branding or growth tactics. I started by asking two questions: who benefits from the coverage and what breaks if we remove it. These two questions quickly revealed that the industry’s recovery would require a reversal of the incentives that leadership had historically optimized for.
The reason Alloy was able to build a national business with repeat customers and media credibility wasn’t because gold suddenly became easier. It was because we made specific leadership considerations who considered long-term trust more important than short-term benefit:
- Transparency about margin maximization. We chose to show our work, including pricing logic, processes and results, even if this made internal negotiations more difficult.
- Systems over discretion. We invested early in standardized processes so that results wouldn’t depend on who happened to be on shift.
- Operational accuracy over speed. We accepted slower early growth in exchange for accuracy, consistency and trust, especially in a physical goods industry where errors are on the rise.
- Customer experience over extraction. We designed the company with the assumption that customers would compare us to them worst previous experience, not their best alternative.
- Visibility over plausible deniability. We built the company so that leadership couldn’t hide from mistakes, because in opaque industries, silence is often the default response.
You don’t fix broken industries by being louder. You solve them by becoming more disciplined. Transparency does not make leadership easier; it makes it inevitable.
The broader takeaway for leaders
Now zoom out beyond gold. Every opaque sector shares these three common characteristics: information imbalance, low consumer confidence and high friction. We see this pattern in car buying, online payments, real estate, healthcare and education. Where clarity is scarce, trust is fragile, and incentives for leadership tend to protect the system rather than fix it.
Why the coverage continues
Opaque systems persist because they benefit the industry. Clarity forces considerations that most organizations would rather avoid. Transparency exposes inefficiencies and uncomfortable truths about how value is created for both customers and companies. In many industries, removing opacity not only changes the customer experience, but also changes who within the organization is considered competent.
What opacity looks like in practice
Many industries rely on the confusion. In real estate, agents’ compensation is usually tied directly to the purchase price, creating incentives that don’t align well with client outcomes. In healthcare, it is not uncommon for costs to remain hidden until care is provided, leaving consumers uncertain about what they can afford and forced to navigate complex systems to obtain basic information. These are transactions that most people cannot opt ​​into, and the constructed opacity creates friction, frustration and a persistent lack of trust.
What changes when leaders are confronted with it?
Some companies have created real change by tackling opacity head-on and eliminating some of the confusion their industries depend on. AutoMaxfor example, introduced a no-negotiation pricing model and transparent inventory information, making the buying process more predictable and less adversarial. By showing upfront prices and giving customers the data they needed to compare options, CarMax helped raise the standard for transparency in an industry long characterized by friction and distrust.
PayPal followed a similar leadership path in online payments. Success comes from clear, consistent product principles and structural decisions, not from opaqueness or hype. It focused on solving a clear market need at a time when older systems were slow and less secure. By focusing on user-centered design, it gained trust and acceptance among both consumers and merchants.
The leadership lesson
The lesson goes far beyond gold. The toughest leadership lessons don’t come from clean markets. They come from countries where clarity threatens the status quo and where doing the right thing requires leaders to change incentives before growth can ever follow.
Leadership is not defined by how much you disrupt the industry, but by whether you are willing to rebuild systems that benefit from being left alone.
Opaque industries don’t need visionaries. They need leaders who are willing to clear the fog, even when transparency makes leadership more difficult.
Register for the Entrepreneur Franchise Bootcampa free five-day email course on how to find and invest in your first profitable business franchise – no business experience required.