New Delhi:
There was no ‘nuclear signaling’ by Islamabad during the military conflict with Pakistan earlier this month, Vikram Miskri Minister of Foreign Affairs told Parliament on Monday evening.
Mr Miskri told the Permanent Committee for External Affairs for External Affairs that the conflict “Conventional” remained and that the use of Islamabad of Chinese made weapons – including the HQ -9 rocket weather system – was not relevant because “what it is important is that we hit hard …”
However, he refused to comment on all Indian fighter jets who may have been shot by Pak Air Defense, referring to the limitations of national security. There were reports – which denied the government – Pakistan had shot five Indian jets, including at least three Rafales.
Concern that nuclear facilities – for weapons or civil use – can be targeted, intentionally or unintentionally, red -flown during the conflict. Such concerns were also shouted by Pakistan in an attempt to paint India as the aggressor and the Indian army ‘blackmail’ in submission. However, these were rejected by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
India, Mr Modi had said, would not be intimidated by ‘nuclear blackmail’. “Every terrorist safe haven that works under this pretext will be confronted with precise and decisive strikes,” he said.
The security council of the United Nations, in a consultation -oriented consultation, also rejected these fears. In fact, the UN Safety Council then grilled a PAK on its support for terror groups.
In a detailed briefing on Operation Sindoor – India’s military response to Pahalgam’s terror attack – Mr. Miskri also said that the United States had no role to play in ceasefiring – the 12 May.
The committee was told that Pak had first contacted; This was in the afternoon of 10 May and after precision strikes due to the Indian military hit suit military installations, including the HQ-9 system made by Chines in Lahore and the strategically important air base of Nur Khan.
Mr Miskri told the committee that a plea for a ceasefire came from Islamabad, in particular from the Pakistani director-general of military operations, who reached his counterpart in Delhi.
In this matter there was no ‘mediation of third parties’, Mr. Miskri assured the panel.
The Minister of Foreign Affairs – who was the face of the government, with Colonel Sofiya Qureshi and wing commander Vyomika Singh, for the 100 hours of the conflict with Pak – was also grilled about the many claims of US President Donald Trump that he had mediated an India -Pakistan peace. “
The government has made it very clear that neither Mr Trump nor his administration played an important role in the Indian army – whose combat experts agreed that suit had kept the ropes. The plea for a cessation -the Fire came from Pak, Mr. Miskri told the committee, and Delhi agreed to listen and to stop the hostilities, because goals set were achieved at the bottom of Sindoor.
On Sindoor, initially focused on and destroyed nine terror camps – four in pack and five in pack -ded Kashmir. These include the headquarters of two important terrorist groups-de Jaish-e-Mohammad that was behind the Uri attacks of Pulwama and 2016, and the Lashkar-e-Taiba.
It was a spur of the Lashkar, the resistance front, which carried out the Pahalgam attack.
India has repeatedly warned Pak against allowing terrorist outfits to operate from his soil, pointing to a mountain of growing evidence that the Pakistani deep state connects with attacks around the world.
On Sindoor, Premier Modi had said before, an important shift in the new strategy of the country in the war against terror meant. Seven MPs, including the Shashi Tharoor of the Congress, will lead all parties to abroad to inform them about this changed doctrine.
#nuclear #signaling #Pak #Sources #parliament #panel #told