Cape COD Lobstermen are entangled in regulations that they fear risk their livelihood and collide with fishing officers who claim that the rules are meant to keep the lobster industry of Massachusetts.
The State Marine Fisheries Advisory Commission has approved emergency regulations that are planned to end later this month as a final rule, so that the Bay State stays in line with the shield and vent size – requirements in New Hampshire and Maine.
About 30 lobsters that are limited to fishing in state waters around outer Cape COD, steaming about how the regulations do not include a withdrawal of a stricter V-switch lobster property.
During the decades, lobstems with only a state permit in the conservation management area had confronted less restrictive maximum size and V-switch rules compared to those with a federal permit.
From last Tuesday, however, the state permit holders in the area, who extend from Chatham to the Racing point of Provincetown, including a part of Upper Cape COD Bay, with the same V-notek possession rules as with a federal permit-a depth of 1/8 ”with or without sets of hair.
Fisheries officers regard V-inching as a nature conservation practice, with “harvesters that cut a notch in a specific tail flipper of an egg-bearing lobster.” Those lobsters must be sent back to the sea when they are recaptured.
The 1/8 “Depth with or without setal hair is the standard for the V -Inchatching about other preservation areas of lobster retention. Outer Cape COD State permit holders had confronted with a ¼” measurement.
At the end of last year, Massachusetts approved a series of rules to implement an addendum in the preservation areas of lobster retention in the Gulf of Maine and Outer Cape Cod, including changes in the sizes with holes and escapes, to be in accordance with accompanying federal standards.
Fishery officials have bound the changes to “Observed falls in the recruit indexes” and “persistent decreases in the juvenile right population.” Outer Cape Lobstermen have prevented them from being punished unfairly.
After a sharp recoil on the addendum of Maine and New Hampshire Lobstermen, the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission turned around in May and escape standards.
This led to the Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries to issue emergency regulations to implement the federal reversal, of which state officials say: “Make sure Massachusett’s lobster fishermen experience consistent regulations within each of the lobster management areas in the Gulf of Maine.”
A withdrawal of the updated V-switch ownership standards was not included in the emergency regulations, which activated complaints from the Outer Cape Lobstermen’s Association.
Brendan Adams, the president of the association, has estimated that according to the new standards: “Members will undergo a reduction of 25% in their catch … probably do a lot of bankruptcy.”
The group is looking for a provisional order in state and federal courts to stop what it says is an “illegal and devastating regulations”. A decision was made under advice in each court prior to the fourth July.
The Outer Cape Lobstermen’s Association has pointed to a so-called settlement that he reached with the state in 2000, allowing lobster men in the region to fish for most V-hekt lobsters in exchange for the requirements for stricter size.
Orleans Lobstermen Bill Amaru urged colleagues to the State Marine Fisheries Advisory Commission to refuse the emergency instructions as a final rule, pointing out how those who have in the southeast of Cape COD is “already lost and working with a huge disadvantage.”
Amaru added that he believes that the state collapses with the “requirements of managers who are hundreds and hundreds of kilometers in our region.”
“I don’t think that’s the right way to do it,” he said. “We have a bottom-up instruction system with the Outer Cape Management Area that has worked. We have a source that is in good health.”
Division of the maritime fisherman director Daniel McKiernan repeatedly stated during last week’s meeting that the emergency regulations do not contain the standards for the possession of V-notch, measurements that he said that the advisory committee approved last fall.
In a memo of the Advisory Committee at the end of last month, McKiernan and Commissioner Thomas O’Shea emphasized their concerns about the potential impact on the wider seafood industry if the emergency regulations have been and were not approved as a definitive rule.
At least one consequence, they wrote, among other things, that seafood traders from Bay State could not “import and non-conformed lobsters between 3 ¼” and 3 5/16 “that were legally caught in Maine or New Hampshire.”
“The lobster industry in Massachusetts is the key to the blue economy, tourism and coastal culture of our state,” said the Marine Fisheries division in a statement that is shared with the Herald. “We are delighted to see the Navy Fisheries Advisory Commission … Take action to ensure that Lobster Fishers from Massachusetts are not subject to stricter regulations compared to neighboring countries, which would have brought our industry into a significantly competitive disadvantage.”
Another potential consequence if the emergency regulations had expired would have been a loss of catch of 10% for lobsters of Massachusetts that mainly fish in state and federal waters in the Gulf of Maine, known as Area 1.
These fishermen have expressed a “clear preference to maintain their more conservative” V-stoky lobster ownership of “zero tolerance,” according to fishing officers.
Arthur “Sooky” Sawyer, president of the Massachusetts Lobstermen’s Association, said he wishes the state “just only treated the Outer Cape issue and had left the rest of the industry.” He estimated that around 600 lobsters in area 1.
“Now we have to have this mood … to punish all the boys in Area 1, or to try to help the boys on the outer jape,” he said. “It’s too much to ask.”
#Massachusetts #Lobster #Fight #Cape #COD #fishermen #punished #unfairly