Budget breakthrough? What my legislators did and did not do

At least it started ok.

Government Tim Walz compiled a press conference on Wednesday with legislative leaders of the State to announce that agreed goals for the state budget are being issued.

The legislative power is supposed to pass a balanced budget financing by the Minnesota government in the next two years before it postpons on 19 May. It is extremely unlikely that they will do this, although speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman, DFL-Brooklyn Park, claims at the aforementioned press conference that the legislators need a special session for a day to complete the budget.

Walz declared a crowded and rapid public by reporters that “it never happened in American history” where someone had a legislator so closely divided (the Senate is 34 DFL, 33 Republicans; the house was divided 67-67 between the parties) who could still reach a budget compromise.

It is especially impressive, the governor said, “in a time of chaos and dysfunction at the federal level.”

“I think the country would appreciate this, because it can still work. Democracy is difficult, but it can still work.”

And then chaos and dysfunction happened.

People started to pound the doors of the locked reception area of ​​the Governor and sing Walz “sold out” and “failed immigrants” on a budget compromise to stop accessing immigrants without paper Minnesotacare, a health care program exploited by the State.

Many of the demonstrators were not furious private citizens, but rather the DFL legislators who have a razor spring in the Senate.

In the midst of the roar of demonstrators, legislators and officials of the administration of Walz answered in a way that suggested that much still had to be done.

This is what we know about the progress when drawing up a state budget.

What exactly did the governor announce on Wednesday?

The Lingua Franca of the budget process of Minnesota is “goals” and “predictions”.

Walz, Hortman, speaker Lisa Demuth, R-cold Springs, and Senate majority leader in Murphy, DFL-St. Paul, Goals set on Wednesday about the size of each expenditure account and the total amount that the Minnesota government will spend in the next two (and four) years.

Walz and the legislators announced that they will spend $ 283 million less in fiscal 2026 and 2027 than what has been laid down in the Minnesota Management and Budget’s (MMB) February forecast.

That brings the total expenditure to $ 67.5 billion in the next two years.

A prediction is exactly that, predictively what the state could do with the help of the past years as a guide. It also expects that income will bring in Minnesota by looking at factors such as tariff uncertainty and possible actions from Federal Reserve.

This reduction in the next two years comprises $ 270 million less compared to the February prediction in the Department of Human Services (DHS), which operates Mednesota’s Medicaid program.

There are modest cuts elsewhere compared to the prediction, such as $ 30 million less for jobs and programs for economic development.

The large and painful cuts come in fiscal 2028 and 2029.

At that time, the State is planning to reduce the K-12 spending by $ 420 million compared to prediction and $ 820 million from DHS. In general, Walz and legislators focus on $ 1.8 billion in cuts during these two years.

Some cuts are now agreed because MMB predicts that Minnesota will transfer from a surplus to a budget deficit of almost $ 6 billion per financial year 2028.

“I am happy to say that we have come up with a budget that was responsible for tax purposes,” said Walz, adding it (as he did in the state of the state’s speech) “This agreement will ensure that Minnesota remains the best place in the country to raise a child.”

Wait, so everything was announced. Were these budget spending goals?

Yes and no.

In fragments of their comments from the press conference, one can pick up which specific issues Walz and legislative leaders have achieved compromises.

Such a subject is health care for immigrants without papers.

Minnesota started a program on January 1 to enable immigrants without papers to register for Minnesotacare, a program that partially subsidizes health care for Minnesotans that live below 200% of the federal armon area.

From April 24, the De Staat program cost $ 3.9 million. But the Republicans say that the costs of Imperil Minnesota to get Medicaid money from Washington will spiral.

In response, Minnesotacare is only accessible by children without papers with adults who have started, Demuth explained.

Dragged over this deal, the legislative people of color and indigenous caucus tried to fully filed from Dflers to storm the press conference. They later held their own press conference and said that they will not unsubscribe from an expenditure law with austerity on Minnesotacare for immigrants without papers.

Asked for the cut, Walz said, “I don’t agree, but I agree with the compromise.”

Murphy, who previously said she would keep the line on Minnesotacare for all immigrants without papers, told reporters: “As children, we learn the skill and value of a compromise.”

I am confused. Is limited subsidized health care for immigrants without papers for only children a fixed problem or not?

It is arranged unless all DFLers vote as a block to stop an expenditure account with that language. Murphy and Hortman should change their current position, which is unlikely in the budget writing process.

What other hot-button issues do legislators agree?

As diligent followers of the state budget process might remember, the Bill financing K-12 schools is stuck in the house about whether they should expand a program that makes time workers per hour-as employees of teachers and food service-employees-unemployment benefits when the school is switched off in the summer.

Hortman explained that the house intends to approve an account of the educational spending as quickly as possible. The House will then introduce a separate legislation that will have the unemployment insurance program in four years.

Also in the field of education, Demuth said: “We have taken major steps in protecting financing for non-public training”, a sign that cuts to help and transport of private students is probably off the table.

A subject that has received much less attention (until today) is that by 2029 the State will close the Stillwater Correctional Facility as part of the budget agreement. The Star Tribune report The decision will meet 550 state employees and 1,172 prisoners and save the state $ 40 million.

What is not included in the budget agreement?

Well, the bills still have to be written with works from these goals.

That means negotiating about what to cut or in some cases, to issue bills that can run for hundreds of pages.

A striking area are medicaid costs, including recipients for long-term care at their houses.

Walz has consistently emphasized the escalating costs of long -term care providers. During his speech by the state, the governor implied that long -term care could quickly make up 1/8 of the budget.

Yet there are no specific Medicaid cuts in the goals, according to Ahna Minge, the state budget director.

That will leave it up to the Human Services Committee of Human Services to reconcile two very different bills when it comes to Medicaid cuts. Committee leaders have all the finding of Medicaid cuts as a fairly unpleasant, if necessary, part of their work.

“This is not something we can say that we are proud of,” said Mohamud Noor, DFL-Minneapolis earlier this month of the Budget Act that the Human Human Services Committee has passed on that he has co-presidents. “But we’ll get there.”

Minnpost reporter Shadi Bushra contributed to this report.

Related