Health experts sound on the alarm about one great great account of the president, whereby the proposed cuts on the health insurance funded by the government can lead to the unnecessary deaths of thousands.
The bill, which is expected to be adopted on July 4, would defeat the coverage of medicaid, reimbursement and financing with $ 793 billion over 10 years and implement restrictive benefits.
This disintegration of the Federal Insurance Program has an estimated major implications for the 71 million people who are registered for Medicaid.
Now an in -depth study led by Dr. Adam Gaffney, a university teacher of medicine at the Harvard Medical School, concluded that it is coverage, financial well -being, medical care and Health of Americans with a low income, rEsulating in a maximum of 12,600 medical deaths per year.
And an even higher increasing death toll would take place behind the necessary care services that are reduced for vulnerable population groups.
This could be, for example, fighting chronic disorders such as heart disease, HIV and cancer, which rely on regular, cheap medication and treatment.
Proponents of the bill say that it will lower taxes, increase the economy and increase paying home at home.
But critics claim that the bill mainly benefits the rich and can lead to increased national debt.
Health experts sound the alarm about the only Big Beautiful Bill Act by the president, and estimates that the proposed cuts on the health insurance funded by the government can lead to the death of thousands
The researchers warn: ‘Nowadays, medicaid enjoys, despite the many shortcomings, broad support from the electorate and serves as the basis of the Nation’s safety net.
“The cuts that are being considered, intended to compensate for the costs of tax cuts that would mainly benefit rich Americans, would be care of millions of strips and probably lead to thousands of medically preventing deaths.”
Researchers identified six potential medicaid cuts that the Budget Committee of the House of Representatives would reduce the estimates of the federal government the Medicaid spending of the federal government with at least $ 100 billion over 10 years.
They include the reduction of the medicaid -matching floor; reduced financing of the medicaid extension of the affordable care act; Medicaid per head of the population; Medicaid work requirements; reduced medicaid provider taxes; And withdrawal of the BIDen era Medicaid subsidiaability rule.
The measure includes exceptions for those who are younger than 19 or older than 64, people with disabilities, pregnant women, most important care providers for young children, people who have recently been released from prisons or prisons or during certain emergencies.
It would only apply to adults who received Medicaid through extensions that 40 states chose to undertake themselves as part of the revision of the health insurance policy of 2010, which has extended the suitability and created a national minimum income threshold.
The team also assessed the general effects of the current home account, which includes three of the six options, together with several smaller policy changes, such as shortening the duration of the retroactive effect of Medicaid and increasing cost exchange for some medicid-in-laws.
The researchers project that these six Medicaid cuts would individually lead to an annual increase of deaths to be prevented between 651 and 12,626.
These cutbacks would increase the number of uninsured Americans with between 600,000 and 3.9 million, and the annual number of people that the required medical care will vary from 129,060 to 838,890.
It can lead to 1.9 million people losing their personal doctor, needed 1.3 million previous medicines and 380,270 women who go without a mammogram.
The authors claim that policymakers must weigh the likely health and financial damage to patients and providers of reducing medicaid expenditure against the desirability of tax reductions, which would mainly benefit rich Americans.
Under the current proposal, childless adults without disabilities who want to cover Medicaid should prove that they worked for 80 hours in the month, volunteered or went to school.
The bill, which is expected to be adopted on July 4, would defeat Medicaid, reimbursement and financing with $ 793 billion over 10 years and implement limiting requirements for benefits (stock image).
But if you have a medically diagnosed disease or disability that does not prevent you from working, you may be exempt from Medicaid -work requirements. This exemption falls under the category of ‘medical fragile’ or have ‘special medical needs’.
Many details of the bill still have to be smoothed out, so that the beneficiaries are left behind a large number of strangers and worry that their diseases may not be enough to release them from the work requirements.
Proponents and sick and disabled registered also are also concerned that even those who may be exempt from work requirements under the law can still lose benefits due to more or difficult paperwork mandates to be made.
From a survey of the tracking that was carried out in May by research agency Kaiser Fundation Kaiser Fund Foundation that the registered parties come from the entire political spectrum, including those who voted on Trump.
About a fourth are Republicans; About a third are Democrats.
The poll showed that about seven in 10 adults are concerned that the federal relief reductions to Medicaid will lead to more uninsured people and care providers in their region.
About half said they were worried that reductions would harm them or their families to get and pay health care.
Other cuts on the table are a proposal to change the federal government’s reimbursement into a limit per person
Amaya Diana, an analyst at KFF, points to work requirements who have been launched in Arkansas and Georgia as keeping people from Medicaid without increasing employment.
Amber Bellazaire, a policy analyst at the Michigan League for public policy, said that the process of checking whether medicaid -in writing complies with the work requirements can be an important reason that people would be refused or eligible.
“Massive coverage losses only because of an administrative burden instead of non -subsidiaability is a considerable care,” she said.
Republicans have proposed a work requirement that is comparable to the conditions for the additional food utility – Food Vouchers.
Who have to work from 16 to 59 years old or can voluntarily be at least 80 hours a month if they are not at school, caring for a child under the age of six, disabled, pregnant or homeless.
Republicans, however, say that the required people can motivate to find work – perhaps even a job that is accompanied by health insurance.
Other cutbacks on the table are a proposal to change into the reimbursement of the federal government, what that would do Move the costs to states and forces them to make difficult choices about who or what they cover.
Joan Alker, executive director of the Georgetown Center for Children and Families, said: ‘People still have needs in health care, even if you purchase their coverage. Their needs on health care will not disappear. ‘
#Trumps #pride #joy #set #prevent #causing #deaths #danger